|
The
Decline and Death of Sound Reasoning
Evolution
Allow me to be politically
incorrect for a moment.
Evolution is false, it is damnable and it is a lie.
In fact evolutionists and scientists are beginning to clash more and more as
science grows to an era that is disproving evolution.
Educators continue to teach bio-medical education on Darwinian
presupposition. Consider the following expectations that suppose all
Christianity today is ignorant:
·
We are
expected to overlook the fact that there is no proven instance of DNA
transmutating across the genus barrier in the natural environment.
· We are
expected to overlook the fact that the kinds of mutations and permutations
that would be necessary for evolution to take place would be a mutinogenesis
of a kind that works to the detriment and ultimate extinction of a species,
not to the advancement of its phylo-genetic development.
·
We are
expected to overlook the fact that any genetic pairing involving nucleic acids
requires previously existing information. The replicative functions of RNA
require an existing bio-data base and information cannot exist without the
pre-existing intelligence to create it.
· Nonetheless,
reason is suspended and we are expected to assume a theory whose plausibility
is, at best, precarious and certainly unproven, as if it were a fact.
·
We are
expected to deny the fact that there is an absence of transient forms and
tremendous gaps in the fossil record that can only be explained by mere
conjecture that we are further expected to treat as hypothesis.
·
In a
generation that has seen ethnic cleansing on a genocidal scale unprecedented
in human history, where other races are portrayed as sub-human, we are
expected to ignore that Darwinism, applied anthropologically and taken to its
natural conclusions, was the basis of Hitler's holocaust.
The scientific problems concerning Darwinism
do not stop with life sciences and social sciences. The problems extend
to the physical sciences. Darwinisn (evolution) simply cannot be
explained in any of the sciences! Consider this:
·
We are
expected to discount the fact that when the world of cosmology and particle
physics was in a debate over questions surrounding propositions such
as "Plank's Constant" and "Heisenger's Uncertainty Principle", Albert
Einstein, the greatest theoretical physicist since Newton, retorted "God
does not play dice with the universe" - putting a nail into the coffin of
causal random effects on the basis of
pure mathematical improbability.
(Casual Random effects in science COULD NOT HAPPEN).
Yet this same mathematical
improbability is the very standard upon which evolutionary views of physical
existence depend! If you have a basic understanding of Chemistry, you
should be interested to know:
· We are expected to ignore the odds in enzyme synthesis against the right
combination of amino acids finding the right balance of covalent relationships
and forming bonds to even begin the complex process of forming extremely long
protein molecules. Peptides must form according to a precise genetically
controlled prescription into chains of polypeptides to make even a single
protein which must be able to biochemically interact with other proteins in an
organism which must maintain a level of homeostasis (chemical balance)
enabling it to survive in and interact with an ecosystem containing countless
other organisms of equal complexity.
The notion that the entire
biosphere could happen to evolve by chance on one particular planet conducive
to sustaining life, and not on any other planet in our solar system, is
statistically ludicrous. This is an implausible theory that has been consistently
inconsistent with itself from Darwin and Le Marc to Watson and Crick, yet is
has become
accepted as fact.
· We pretend, as
Stephen Hawkins did in his book A Brief History of Time, that evolution
has a way to deal with the problem caused by entropy (Newton's Second Law of
Thermodynamics). The problem is that when we reach the end of his book, we find out
that it is just more of the same old nonsense, requiring even longer periods
of time to achieve even the most minuscule formation of anything that could
broadly be defined as somehow leading to the emergence of biological life.
·
In the name of reason,
we are yet again expected to abandon reason.
· In the name of
modern science, we are expected to neglect the fact that the founders of
modern science, from Newton and Pascal to Keppler to Pasteur and Einstein,
were uniformly
theists, believing in an intelligent creator, to say
nothing of the fact that others, such as Rutherford and Farraday were
professing evangelical Christians.
There are both scientifically and
theologically good and bad versions of creation science. There are, however,
no good versions of Darwinism, scientifically, theologically or otherwise.
I have yet to have one single person explain any of the above facts using
Darwinisn alone!
The Word of God specifically warns
of such foolishness concerning speculation about His creation;
"professing
themselves to
be wise, they become fools..." (Romans 1:
21-24), and God gives them over to such foolishness to allow them to believe
what a logical mind would call unbelievable.
God not only will give them over to a reprobate mind
logically, but will also do so spiritually. The end result is a mind that can
no longer reason in itself enough to find the truth of God himself.
Let's now, examine
Medical Science itself.
Α Ω
|
