<<

 

 

 

 >>

Is it a Crime to Speak the Truth?


Hate Crime:  How is it Defined?

Since former President George Bush signed into law, the "Hate Crimes Statistics Act" on April 23, 1990, we have seen legislators grope at the opportunity to promote unethical, irreverent, vile, obscene, perverse lifestyles, speech, and thinking.  The world has rallied around this new method of erasing the knowledge of sin from their lives.  After all, if sin can be redefined as an "alternate" method of living, thinking, and acting, then the very concept of wrong-doing becomes only a choice to live a bit differently.  After all if we could somehow redefine murder and call it a "mercy-killing", then it becomes acceptable by the majority. 

The law former President Bush (Sr.) signed, gave a mandate to the Department of Justice to collect data from "hate crimes" and was done under the Federal Uniform Crimes Reporting guidelines.

The FBI reported over the next few years, that "hate crimes" are extremely difficult to identify simply due to the nature of the definition especially since all crime contains an element of hate!  Much of the FBI's report contained information on "simple assault" and "intimidation" incidents, none of which could be readily classified as a "hate crime".  Real crimes, they suggested, involved such things as vandalism, credible threats, actual assaults and violence.  It was further stated that these types of crimes were already handled at the state levels and there was no need for Federal intervention. 

When former President Bill Clinton appointed Janet Reno, a lesbian, to the office of Attorney General, the real purpose of the "hate crimes" bill had not yet been manifested.  Ms. Reno expanded the law to include, not surprisingly, "sexual orientation".  This made public disapproval of homosexuality potentially a prosecutable offense:  a hate crime!  Of course, because there was so much "outcry" by the public and especially by the Christian community against homosexuality, this classification expansion to include sexual orientation as a hate crime provided what Ms. Reno needed to put some "bite" into the law:  she now had an "epidemic" of hate crimes. 

With the expanded definition including sexual orientation, what we had now was a way to determine those who follow true biblical teachings from those who do not!  Hence, Christians were now "identified" as a specific class of people.

1.  Identification had been accomplished.


Most Christians are very aware that "tolerance" is the war cry of the anti-religious, anti-God, anti-Christian crowd.  We're told that Christians are "intolerant" because they will not accept the ideas or views with which they disagree.  The truth of the matter is that it is not "tolerance" most people who rally behind this movement really want.  It is "acceptance and affirmation of and agreement with their particular lifestyles that is the real motivation behind the cries of tolerance. 

Christians believe truth will always prevail over error and the anti-Christian crowd cries foul when a Christian would dare stand to point out error.  This friend is not tolerance, it is relativism.  Relativism is the idea that truth is relevant only to the individual or culture holding a particular belief.  In the process of relativism, truth is the casualty. 

The real intolerance is not to allow someone to disagree with their views without threat of sanctions, censorship or violence.

Christians are being classified daily as intolerant, unloving, hateful and hypocritical.  Jesus said these things would happen.  Why then should the church be take by surprise when the world HATES them?  We've enjoyed our time of embrace when the world and its system loved the church and adhered to a lot of its values.  That time, folks, is over.  There is s separation between the church and the world that is growing every wider and will ultimately end in the greatest war to ever take place:  That between the system of anti-Christ and Christ himself!

We have witnessed as giant mega-retail stores have demanded that employees refrain from using terms such as "Merry Christmas" because the word "Christmas" was offensive to others.  We've been told we can't pray at schools, school events or graduations.  We've watched as the ACLU has attacked Christians over nativity displays, crucifixes and even crosses on top of churches! 

Christians and Christianity has been told how "intolerant' and inferior our beliefs have become.  Christians have been attacked for voicing their opinions that Islam is not a "race of people" but an intolerant, hate-filled religion of Satanic perversion and violence.  It is the Christian that has been under fire for expressing outrage against the intolerance of Radical Religious Islam.

Even American Presidents have jumped on the bandwagon of the anti-Christian rhetoric.  Former President Clinton described Christian and Conservative Radio programs as being "negative, intolerant and cynical".  It is well documented that the former President and his cabinet referred to Christian and Conservative talk shows as "hate radio" (Source:  Washington Watch, 1998)

"Some of the press who speak loudly about the freedom of the press are themselves the enemies of freedom. Countless people dare not say a thing because they know it will be picked up and made a song of by the press. That limits freedom.” Geoffrey Fisher, former Archbishop of Canterbury

Do you think Christianity is not under attack with the Hate Crimes acts?  View these brief videos and decide for yourself. (Links are offsite and REALPLAYER is required!)

Arlene:  Arrested in Philadelphia for Protesting A Gay March (one of the Philadelphia 11)

Linda Beckman:  Also arrested with the Philadelphia 11

Read more about these arrests!

2.  Marginalization has been accomplished

 



Α Ω

 

 
Website by: T. L. Tuberville